↓ Skip to main content

Workgroup Report: Drinking-Water Nitrate and Health—Recent Findings and Research Needs

Overview of attention for article published in EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
606 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
576 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Workgroup Report: Drinking-Water Nitrate and Health—Recent Findings and Research Needs
Published in
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, June 2005
DOI 10.1289/ehp.8043
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary H. Ward, Theo M. deKok, Patrick Levallois, Jean Brender, Gabriel Gulis, Bernard T. Nolan, James VanDerslice

Abstract

Human alteration of the nitrogen cycle has resulted in steadily accumulating nitrate in our water resources. The U.S. maximum contaminant level and World Health Organization guidelines for nitrate in drinking water were promulgated to protect infants from developing methemoglobinemia, an acute condition. Some scientists have recently suggested that the regulatory limit for nitrate is overly conservative; however, they have not thoroughly considered chronic health outcomes. In August 2004, a symposium on drinking-water nitrate and health was held at the International Society for Environmental Epidemiology meeting to evaluate nitrate exposures and associated health effects in relation to the current regulatory limit. The contribution of drinking-water nitrate toward endogenous formation of N-nitroso compounds was evaluated with a focus toward identifying subpopulations with increased rates of nitrosation. Adverse health effects may be the result of a complex interaction of the amount of nitrate ingested, the concomitant ingestion of nitrosation cofactors and precursors, and specific medical conditions that increase nitrosation. Workshop participants concluded that more experimental studies are needed and that a particularly fruitful approach may be to conduct epidemiologic studies among susceptible subgroups with increased endogenous nitrosation. The few epidemiologic studies that have evaluated intake of nitrosation precursors and/or nitrosation inhibitors have observed elevated risks for colon cancer and neural tube defects associated with drinking-water nitrate concentrations below the regulatory limit. The role of drinking-water nitrate exposure as a risk factor for specific cancers, reproductive outcomes, and other chronic health effects must be studied more thoroughly before changes to the regulatory level for nitrate in drinking water can be considered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 576 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 559 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 19%
Researcher 89 15%
Student > Master 87 15%
Student > Bachelor 71 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 5%
Other 80 14%
Unknown 113 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 129 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 16%
Engineering 51 9%
Chemistry 35 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 5%
Other 95 16%
Unknown 143 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,779,876
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#1,445
of 8,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,656
of 67,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#21
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.