↓ Skip to main content

Type A personality, hostility, time urgency and unintentional injuries among Chinese undergraduates: a matched case–control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Type A personality, hostility, time urgency and unintentional injuries among Chinese undergraduates: a matched case–control study
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1066
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongying Shi, Xinjun Yang, Jingjing Wang, Haiyang Xi, Chenping Huang, Jincai He, Maoping Chu, Guihua Zhuang

Abstract

Associations between type A behaviour pattern (TABP) and injuries are inconsistent. These inconsistencies may be due to different effects of various components of TABP, namely time urgency/impatience, hostility and competitive drive. It is important to examine the relationship between the global TABP, its two components, and unintentional injuries, among undergraduates in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 5 14%
Lecturer 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 8 23%
Unknown 8 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 8 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2017.
All research outputs
#4,159,241
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,670
of 14,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,934
of 212,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#88
of 283 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 283 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.