↓ Skip to main content

High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3076 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4261 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Published in
Science, November 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1244693
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, J. R. G. Townshend

Abstract

Quantification of global forest change has been lacking despite the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services. In this study, Earth observation satellite data were used to map global forest loss (2.3 million square kilometers) and gain (0.8 million square kilometers) from 2000 to 2012 at a spatial resolution of 30 meters. The tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with forest loss increasing by 2101 square kilometers per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola, and elsewhere. Intensive forestry practiced within subtropical forests resulted in the highest rates of forest change globally. Boreal forest loss due largely to fire and forestry was second to that in the tropics in absolute and proportional terms. These results depict a globally consistent and locally relevant record of forest change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,207 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 75 2%
United Kingdom 39 <1%
Brazil 34 <1%
Canada 17 <1%
Argentina 15 <1%
Germany 13 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
Colombia 9 <1%
Australia 8 <1%
Other 101 2%
Unknown 3939 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 979 23%
Researcher 920 22%
Student > Master 749 18%
Student > Bachelor 349 8%
Unspecified 342 8%
Other 921 22%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1476 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1138 27%
Unspecified 601 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 540 13%
Engineering 116 3%
Other 389 9%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1904. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2019.
All research outputs
#908
of 13,639,673 outputs
Outputs from Science
#79
of 62,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 183,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,639,673 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.