↓ Skip to main content

High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change

Overview of attention for article published in Science, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
3038 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4209 Mendeley
citeulike
10 CiteULike
Title
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Published in
Science, November 2013
DOI 10.1126/science.1244693
Pubmed ID
Authors

M. C. Hansen, P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, J. R. G. Townshend

Abstract

Quantification of global forest change has been lacking despite the recognized importance of forest ecosystem services. In this study, Earth observation satellite data were used to map global forest loss (2.3 million square kilometers) and gain (0.8 million square kilometers) from 2000 to 2012 at a spatial resolution of 30 meters. The tropics were the only climate domain to exhibit a trend, with forest loss increasing by 2101 square kilometers per year. Brazil's well-documented reduction in deforestation was offset by increasing forest loss in Indonesia, Malaysia, Paraguay, Bolivia, Zambia, Angola, and elsewhere. Intensive forestry practiced within subtropical forests resulted in the highest rates of forest change globally. Boreal forest loss due largely to fire and forestry was second to that in the tropics in absolute and proportional terms. These results depict a globally consistent and locally relevant record of forest change.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,212 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4,209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 75 2%
United Kingdom 39 <1%
Brazil 35 <1%
Canada 17 <1%
Argentina 15 <1%
Germany 13 <1%
Spain 11 <1%
Colombia 9 <1%
Mexico 9 <1%
Other 102 2%
Unknown 3884 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 964 23%
Researcher 908 22%
Student > Master 741 18%
Student > Bachelor 342 8%
Unspecified 336 8%
Other 917 22%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1453 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1130 27%
Unspecified 589 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 540 13%
Engineering 111 3%
Other 385 9%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1909. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#877
of 13,535,507 outputs
Outputs from Science
#79
of 62,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17
of 182,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#3
of 857 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,535,507 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 62,445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 44.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 857 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.