You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstructing the Population Genetic History of the Caribbean
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Genetics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003925 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrés Moreno-Estrada, Simon Gravel, Fouad Zakharia, Jacob L. McCauley, Jake K. Byrnes, Christopher R. Gignoux, Patricia A. Ortiz-Tello, Ricardo J. Martínez, Dale J. Hedges, Richard W. Morris, Celeste Eng, Karla Sandoval, Suehelay Acevedo-Acevedo, Paul J. Norman, Zulay Layrisse, Peter Parham, Juan Carlos Martínez-Cruzado, Esteban González Burchard, Michael L. Cuccaro, Eden R. Martin, Carlos D. Bustamante |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Dominican Republic | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 25 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 68% |
| Scientists | 16 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 402 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 383 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 99 | 25% |
| Researcher | 88 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 10% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 154 | 38% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 89 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 23 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 41 | 10% |
| Unknown | 57 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 115. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2024.
All research outputs
#372,170
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Genetics
#210
of 9,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,816
of 225,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Genetics
#3
of 182 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 182 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.