↓ Skip to main content

Hydration for treatment of preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydration for treatment of preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003096.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catalin M Stan, Michel Boulvain, Riccardo Pfister, Pascale Hirsbrunner-Almagbaly

Abstract

Hydration has been proposed as a treatment for women with preterm labour. Theoretically, hydration may reduce uterine contractility by increasing uterine blood flow and by decreasing pituitary secretion of antidiuretic hormone and oxytocin.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 109 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Environmental Science 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 28 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,352,910
of 16,562,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,545
of 11,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,110
of 190,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#37
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,562,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.