↓ Skip to main content

Hydration for treatment of preterm labour

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydration for treatment of preterm labour
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003096.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catalin M Stan, Michel Boulvain, Riccardo Pfister, Pascale Hirsbrunner-Almagbaly

Abstract

Hydration has been proposed as a treatment for women with preterm labour. Theoretically, hydration may reduce uterine contractility by increasing uterine blood flow and by decreasing pituitary secretion of antidiuretic hormone and oxytocin.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 41 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Psychology 5 4%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 14 10%
Unknown 43 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2019.
All research outputs
#4,447,553
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,775
of 12,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,098
of 214,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#141
of 237 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,634 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 237 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.