↓ Skip to main content

Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 2,960)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
12 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
70 tweeters
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States
Published in
Biological Conservation, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.007
Authors

Scott R. Loss, Tom Will, Peter P. Marra

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Portugal 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
Poland 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 166 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 35%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 16%
Student > Master 28 15%
Other 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Other 21 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 109 58%
Environmental Science 54 29%
Unspecified 7 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Other 9 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 216. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2017.
All research outputs
#33,213
of 8,518,079 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#15
of 2,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#534
of 134,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 8,518,079 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.