↓ Skip to main content

Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy

Overview of attention for article published in this source, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
31 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
144 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic antimicrobial prophylaxis for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005571.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lipp, Allyson, Lusardi, Gail

Abstract

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a surgical procedure performed to maintain nutrition in the short- or long-term. During the procedure, a feeding tube that delivers either a liquid diet, or medication, via a clean or sterile delivery system, is placed surgically through the anterior abdominal wall. Those undergoing PEG tube placement are often vulnerable to infection because of age, compromised nutritional intake, immunosuppression, or underlying disease processes such as malignancy and diabetes mellitus. The increasing incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contributes both an additional risk to the placement procedure, and to the debate surrounding antibiotic prophylaxis for PEG tube placement. The aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis is to establish a bactericidal concentration of an antimicrobial drug in the patient's serum and tissues, via a brief course of an appropriate agent, by the time of PEG tube placement in order to prevent any peristomal infections that might result from the procedure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 17%
Researcher 23 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Other 12 8%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 9%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 38 26%