↓ Skip to main content

Technical efficiency of public district hospitals and health centres in Ghana: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Technical efficiency of public district hospitals and health centres in Ghana: a pilot study
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2005
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-3-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Osei, Selassi d'Almeida, Melvill O George, Joses M Kirigia, Ayayi Omar Mensah, Lenity H Kainyu

Abstract

The Government of Ghana has been implementing various health sector reforms (e.g. user fees in public health facilities, decentralization, sector-wide approaches to donor coordination) in a bid to improve efficiency in health care. However, to date, except for the pilot study reported in this paper, no attempt has been made to make an estimate of the efficiency of hospitals and/or health centres in Ghana. The objectives of this study, based on data collected in 2000, were: (i) to estimate the relative technical efficiency (TE) and scale efficiency (SE) of a sample of public hospitals and health centres in Ghana; and (ii) to demonstrate policy implications for health sector policy-makers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 3 1%
Kenya 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 194 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 23%
Researcher 29 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 7%
Other 40 20%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 22%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 41 20%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 21 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 4%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 35 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,375,523
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#197
of 418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,174
of 58,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 58,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them