You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diet and toenail arsenic concentrations in a New Hampshire population with arsenic-containing water
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-149 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kathryn L Cottingham, Roxanne Karimi, Joann F Gruber, M Scot Zens, Vicki Sayarath, Carol L Folt, Tracy Punshon, J Steven Morris, Margaret R Karagas |
| Abstract |
Limited data exist on the contribution of dietary sources of arsenic to an individual's total exposure, particularly in populations with exposure via drinking water. Here, the association between diet and toenail arsenic concentrations (a long-term biomarker of exposure) was evaluated for individuals with measured household tap water arsenic. Foods known to be high in arsenic, including rice and seafood, were of particular interest. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 36% |
| Netherlands | 3 | 12% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 16% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Researcher | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#494,530
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#157
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,689
of 208,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.