You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Targeted Temperature Management at 33°C versus 36°C after Cardiac Arrest
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1310519 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Niklas Nielsen, Jørn Wetterslev, Tobias Cronberg, David Erlinge, Yvan Gasche, Christian Hassager, Janneke Horn, Jan Hovdenes, Jesper Kjaergaard, Michael Kuiper, Tommaso Pellis, Pascal Stammet, Michael Wanscher, Matt P Wise, Anders Åneman, Nawaf Al-Subaie, Søren Boesgaard, John Bro-Jeppesen, Iole Brunetti, Jan Frederik Bugge, Christopher D Hingston, Nicole P Juffermans, Matty Koopmans, Lars Køber, Jørund Langørgen, Gisela Lilja, Jacob Eifer Møller, Malin Rundgren, Christian Rylander, Ondrej Smid, Christophe Werer, Per Winkel, Hans Friberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 516 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 106 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 87 | 17% |
Canada | 26 | 5% |
Australia | 14 | 3% |
Spain | 13 | 3% |
Chile | 9 | 2% |
Japan | 7 | 1% |
Ireland | 6 | 1% |
Saudi Arabia | 5 | <1% |
Other | 67 | 13% |
Unknown | 176 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 324 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 129 | 25% |
Scientists | 45 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 3% |
Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,882 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 18 | <1% |
Canada | 8 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 6 | <1% |
Italy | 5 | <1% |
Brazil | 5 | <1% |
Netherlands | 4 | <1% |
Spain | 4 | <1% |
Belgium | 3 | <1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
Other | 21 | 1% |
Unknown | 1806 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 322 | 17% |
Researcher | 259 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 181 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 172 | 9% |
Student > Master | 158 | 8% |
Other | 472 | 25% |
Unknown | 318 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 1210 | 64% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 83 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 2% |
Neuroscience | 26 | 1% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 24 | 1% |
Other | 121 | 6% |
Unknown | 372 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 681. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#31,514
of 25,774,185 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,208
of 32,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193
of 317,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#8
of 280 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,774,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 280 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.