↓ Skip to main content

Progestin‐only pills for contraception

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Progestin‐only pills for contraception
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007541.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David A Grimes, Laureen M Lopez, Paul A O'Brien, Elizabeth G. Raymond

Abstract

The introduction of a new progestin-only oral contraceptive in Europe has renewed interest in this class of oral contraceptives. Unlike the more widely used combined oral contraceptives containing an estrogen plus progestin, these pills contain only a progestin (progestogen) and are taken without interruption. How these pills compare to others in their class or to combined oral contraceptives is not clear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 223 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 33 15%
Researcher 28 13%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 7%
Other 10 4%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 76 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 6%
Social Sciences 12 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Other 29 13%
Unknown 82 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,728,286
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,943
of 12,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,067
of 224,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#156
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.