↓ Skip to main content

A desk review on institutional and non-institutional organizations active in the field of migrant's health in the WHO European Region.

Overview of attention for article published in Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 157)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A desk review on institutional and non-institutional organizations active in the field of migrant's health in the WHO European Region.
Published in
Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità, October 2015
DOI 10.4415/ann_15_04_11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ingrosso, Loredana, Schmidt, Tanja, Sherally, Jamila, Dembech, Matteo, Barragan Montes, Sara, Sa Machado, Rita, Annunziata, Giuseppe, Rezza, Giovanni, Severoni, Santino, Montes, Sara Barragan, Machado, Rita Sa

Abstract

Migrants have problematic access to health-care; non-institutional organizations (NGOs), as well as institutional bodies may play a role in facilitating their access to mainstream health care. Our research reviews actions that address the need of migrants in terms of health care in order to understand how, where, and who participates in this effort. Data were from desk or web research, declaration from organisations and their websites, information from WHO Country Offices. 154 NGOs were identified in the WHO European Region. 58% were direct health care providers while the remaining provided either mediation services or were part of a network organization. 173 national institutes (GOVs) were found; less than the 20% were directly or indirectly involved in health care, whereas the majority were involved in research, policy development, international relations and human rights. Some gaps, a certain fragmentation and lack of coordination were identified. WHO can play an overarching role in the exchange of expertise and harmonisation of the efforts in this field.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 300%
Student > Bachelor 2 200%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 100%
Student > Master 1 100%
Librarian 1 100%
Other 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 400%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 200%
Social Sciences 2 200%
Sports and Recreations 1 100%
Environmental Science 1 100%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2022.
All research outputs
#6,505,496
of 20,099,502 outputs
Outputs from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#26
of 157 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,395
of 282,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annali dell'Istituto Superiore di Sanità
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,099,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 157 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them