You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hospital process orientation from an operations management perspective: development of a measurement tool and practical testing in three ophthalmic practices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-13-475 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pedro D Gonçalves, Marie Louise Hagenbeek, Jan M H Vissers |
| Abstract |
Although research interest in hospital process orientation (HPO) is growing, the development of a measurement tool to assess process orientation (PO) has not been very successful yet. To view a hospital as a series of processes organized around patients with a similar demand seems to be an attractive proposition, but it is hard to operationalize this idea in a measurement tool that can actually measure the level of PO. This research contributes to HPO from an operations management (OM) perspective by addressing the alignment, integration and coordination of activities within patient care processes. The objective of this study was to develop and practically test a new measurement tool for assessing the degree of PO within hospitals using existing tools. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Mauritius | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 16% |
| Researcher | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 16% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 17 | 21% |
| Engineering | 13 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2017.
All research outputs
#15,655,267
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,571
of 8,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,511
of 220,239 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#92
of 143 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,239 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 143 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.