You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of 10-week core stabilization exercise training and detraining on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s50436 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rungthip Puntumetakul, Pattanasin Areeudomwong, Alongkot Emasithi, Junichiro Yamauchi |
| Abstract |
Clinical lumbar instability causes pain and socioeconomic suffering; however, an appropriate treatment for this condition is unknown. This article examines the effect of a 10 week core stabilization exercise (CSE) program and 3 month follow-up on pain-related outcomes in patients with clinical lumbar instability. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 3 | 25% |
| Spain | 2 | 17% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 182 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 34 | 18% |
| Unknown | 46 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 56 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 28 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,571,287
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#110
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,392
of 226,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.