↓ Skip to main content

How much groundwater did California's Central Valley lose during the 2012‐2016 drought?

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
87 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How much groundwater did California's Central Valley lose during the 2012‐2016 drought?
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, January 2017
DOI 10.1002/2017gl073333
Authors

Xiao, Mu, Koppa, Akash, Mekonnen, Zelalem, Pagán, Brianna R., Zhan, Shengan, Cao, Qian, Aierken, Abureli, Lee, Hyongki, Lettenmaier, Dennis P., Mu Xiao, Akash Koppa, Zelalem Mekonnen, Brianna R. Pagán, Shengan Zhan, Qian Cao, Abureli Aierken, Hyongki Lee, Dennis P. Lettenmaier

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 87 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 132. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 June 2017.
All research outputs
#53,682
of 7,955,577 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#163
of 9,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,072
of 223,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,955,577 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,913 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.