↓ Skip to main content

Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 64,992)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
322 news outlets
blogs
24 blogs
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
7497 X users
facebook
74 Facebook pages
googleplus
12 Google+ users
reddit
4 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
392 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
666 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease, cancer, and mortality: prospective cohort study
Published in
British Medical Journal, April 2017
DOI 10.1136/bmj.j1456
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos A Celis-Morales, Donald M Lyall, Paul Welsh, Jana Anderson, Lewis Steell, Yibing Guo, Reno Maldonado, Daniel F Mackay, Jill P Pell, Naveed Sattar, Jason M R Gill

Abstract

Objective To investigate the association between active commuting and incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), cancer, and all cause mortality.Design Prospective population based study. Setting UK Biobank.Participants 263 450 participants (106 674 (52%) women; mean age 52.6), recruited from 22 sites across the UK. The exposure variable was the mode of transport used (walking, cycling, mixed mode v non-active (car or public transport)) to commute to and from work on a typical day.Main outcome measures Incident (fatal and non-fatal) CVD and cancer, and deaths from CVD, cancer, or any causes.Results 2430 participants died (496 were related to CVD and 1126 to cancer) over a median of 5.0 years (interquartile range 4.3-5.5) follow-up. There were 3748 cancer and 1110 CVD events. In maximally adjusted models, commuting by cycle and by mixed mode including cycling were associated with lower risk of all cause mortality (cycling hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 0.83, P=0.002; mixed mode cycling 0.76, 0.58 to 1.00, P<0.05), cancer incidence (cycling 0.55, 0.44 to 0.69, P<0.001; mixed mode cycling 0.64, 0.45 to 0.91, P=0.01), and cancer mortality (cycling 0.60, 0.40 to 0.90, P=0.01; mixed mode cycling 0.68, 0.57 to 0.81, P<0.001). Commuting by cycling and walking were associated with a lower risk of CVD incidence (cycling 0.54, 0.33 to 0.88, P=0.01; walking 0.73, 0.54 to 0.99, P=0.04) and CVD mortality (cycling 0.48, 0.25 to 0.92, P=0.03; walking 0.64, 0.45 to 0.91, P=0.01). No statistically significant associations were observed for walking commuting and all cause mortality or cancer outcomes. Mixed mode commuting including walking was not noticeably associated with any of the measured outcomes.Conclusions Cycle commuting was associated with a lower risk of CVD, cancer, and all cause mortality. Walking commuting was associated with a lower risk of CVD independent of major measured confounding factors. Initiatives to encourage and support active commuting could reduce risk of death and the burden of important chronic conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7,497 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 666 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Unknown 653 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 117 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 82 12%
Researcher 75 11%
Student > Bachelor 74 11%
Other 41 6%
Other 117 18%
Unknown 160 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 137 21%
Sports and Recreations 57 9%
Engineering 47 7%
Social Sciences 43 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 5%
Other 139 21%
Unknown 207 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7081. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#406
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#12
of 64,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1
of 325,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#1
of 870 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 870 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.