↓ Skip to main content

Cancer Incidence in World Trade Center Rescue and Recovery Workers, 2001–2008

Overview of attention for article published in EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
61 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
6 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cancer Incidence in World Trade Center Rescue and Recovery Workers, 2001–2008
Published in
EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2013
DOI 10.1289/ehp.1205894
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samara Solan, Sylvan Wallenstein, Moshe Shapiro, Susan L. Teitelbaum, Lori Stevenson, Anne Kochman, Julia Kaplan, Cornelia Dellenbaugh, Amy Kahn, F. Noah Biro, Michael Crane, Laura Crowley, Janice Gabrilove, Lou Gonsalves, Denise Harrison, Robin Herbert, Benjamin Luft, Steven B. Markowitz, Jacqueline Moline, Xiaoling Niu, Henry Sacks, Gauri Shukla, Iris Udasin, Roberto G. Lucchini, Paolo Boffetta, Philip J. Landrigan

Abstract

World Trade Center (WTC) rescue and recovery workers were exposed to a complex mix of pollutants and carcinogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 66 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Master 9 13%
Researcher 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 36%
Social Sciences 6 9%
Environmental Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 21 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 494. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2023.
All research outputs
#52,792
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#65
of 8,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#273
of 207,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EHP toxicogenomics journal of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
#1
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 207,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.