↓ Skip to main content

Business Process Management

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Business Process Management'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 Rethinking BPM in a Cognitive World: Transforming How We Learn and Perform Business Processes
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Ontological Considerations About the Representation of Events and Endurants in Business Models
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 A Unified Approach for Measuring Precision and Generalization Based on Anti-alignments
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 A Stability Assessment Framework for Process Discovery Techniques
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Measuring the Quality of Models with Respect to the Underlying System: An Empirical Study
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Handling Duplicated Tasks in Process Discovery by Refining Event Labels
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Discovering Duplicate Tasks in Transition Systems for the Simplification of Process Models
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 From Low-Level Events to Activities - A Pattern-Based Approach
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Discovering and Exploring State-Based Models for Multi-perspective Processes
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Semantical Vacuity Detection in Declarative Process Mining
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 In Log and Model We Trust? A Generalized Conformance Checking Framework
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 A Recursive Paradigm for Aligning Observed Behavior of Large Structured Process Models
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Semantics and Analysis of DMN Decision Tables
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Dynamic Skipping and Blocking and Dead Path Elimination for Cyclic Workflows
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 The Complexity of Deadline Analysis for Workflow Graphs with Multiple Resources
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Dealing with Behavioral Ambiguity in Textual Process Descriptions
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 The Effect of Modularity Representation and Presentation Medium on the Understandability of Business Process Models in BPMN
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Towards Quality-Aware Translations of Activity-Centric Processes to Guard Stage Milestone
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Untrusted Business Process Monitoring and Execution Using Blockchain
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Classification and Formalization of Instance-Spanning Constraints in Process-Driven Applications
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Value at Risk Within Business Processes: An Automated IT Risk Governance Approach
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 PRISM – A Predictive Risk Monitoring Approach for Business Processes
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Predictive Business Process Monitoring with Structured and Unstructured Data
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 P $$^3$$ -Folder: Optimal Model Simplification for Improving Accuracy in Process Performance Prediction
Attention for Chapter 22: PRISM – A Predictive Risk Monitoring Approach for Business Processes
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
PRISM – A Predictive Risk Monitoring Approach for Business Processes
Chapter number 22
Book title
Business Process Management
Published in
Lecture notes in computer science, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45348-4_22
Book ISBNs
978-3-31-945347-7, 978-3-31-945348-4
Authors

Raffaele Conforti, Sven Fink, Jonas Manderscheid, Maximilian Röglinger, Conforti, Raffaele, Fink, Sven, Manderscheid, Jonas, Röglinger, Maximilian

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Saudi Arabia 1 2%
Unknown 48 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 31%
Student > Master 9 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 9 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 15 31%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 27%
Engineering 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 10 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,454,502
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#4,658
of 8,137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,345
of 333,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#276
of 503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,137 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.