↓ Skip to main content

Aspectos geográficos e organizacionais dos serviços de atenção primária à saúde na detecção de casos de tuberculose em Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 2012

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aspectos geográficos e organizacionais dos serviços de atenção primária à saúde na detecção de casos de tuberculose em Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 2012
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, January 2017
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742017000100015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simone Pieren dos Reis, Jenifer Harter, Lílian Moura de Lima, Dagoberta Alves Vieira, Pedro Fredemir Palha, Roxana Isabel Cardozo Gonzales

Abstract

to evaluate the geographical and organizational aspects of primary health care services in detecting tuberculosis cases in Pelotas-RS, Brazil. this was a descriptive evaluation study involving 276 health professionals in 2012; data were collected using a structured questionnaire covering geographical and organizational aspects which received a score using a Likert scale of 1 to 5. average use of motorized transport by symptomatic respiratory patients having a cough for more than three weeks to get to a healthcare service was considered regular by respondents; although there was satisfactory availability of health professionals, human resource turnover and time-keeping were considered unsatisfactory; average time of more than 60 minutes waiting to see the doctor and average time spent with the doctor were considered regular. organizational and geographic characteristics identified as unsatisfactory may interfere with the detection of tuberculosis cases in Pelotas-RS.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 27%
Professor 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 32%
Social Sciences 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#324
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#362,560
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#7
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.