↓ Skip to main content

Descrição dos registros repetidos no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação, Brasil, 2008-2009*

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Descrição dos registros repetidos no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação, Brasil, 2008-2009*
Published in
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, September 2016
DOI 10.5123/s1679-49742016000300005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sérgio Henrique Almeida da Silva, Jurema Corrêa da Mota, Raulino Sabino da Silva, Mônica Rodrigues Campos, Joyce Mendes de Andrade Schramm

Abstract

to describe the proportion of duplicate records held on the Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System, 2008-2009. identification of duplicate records of dengue, leprosy, visceral leishmaniasis and cutaneous leishmaniasis, meningitis and tuberculosis was conducted using Reclink III(r); the proportion of duplicate records was calculated by geographical region, state and municipal population size categories. visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and meningitis had higher proportions of duplicate notification (5.3% and 3.6%, respectively) whilst leprosy had the lowest (0.7%); the states with highest repetitions were Rio Grande do Norte (VL 6.8% and leprosy 5.1%), Rio de Janeiro (tuberculosis 2.5% and meningitis 4.9%) and Goiás (dengue 2.0% and meningitis 7.2%). the Northeast region had the highest proportion of duplicate records for four of the six diseases analyzed; with the exception of dengue, percentage repetition was lower in municipalities with larger population size.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 28%
Student > Bachelor 9 28%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 6 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 8 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,911,550
of 13,722,218 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#120
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,343
of 263,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,722,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.