You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Descrição dos registros repetidos no Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação, Brasil, 2008-2009
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.5123/s1679-49742016000300005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sérgio Henrique Almeida da Silva Júnior, Jurema Corrêa da Mota, Raulino Sabino da Silva, Mônica Rodrigues Campos, Joyce Mendes de Andrade Schramm |
| Abstract |
to describe the proportion of duplicate records held on the Brazilian Notifiable Diseases Information System, 2008-2009. identification of duplicate records of dengue, leprosy, visceral leishmaniasis and cutaneous leishmaniasis, meningitis and tuberculosis was conducted using Reclink III(r); the proportion of duplicate records was calculated by geographical region, state and municipal population size categories. visceral leishmaniasis (VL) and meningitis had higher proportions of duplicate notification (5.3% and 3.6%, respectively) whilst leprosy had the lowest (0.7%); the states with highest repetitions were Rio Grande do Norte (VL 6.8% and leprosy 5.1%), Rio de Janeiro (tuberculosis 2.5% and meningitis 4.9%) and Goiás (dengue 2.0% and meningitis 7.2%). the Northeast region had the highest proportion of duplicate records for four of the six diseases analyzed; with the exception of dengue, percentage repetition was lower in municipalities with larger population size. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 8 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#273
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,807
of 348,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologia e Serviços de Saúde
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.