↓ Skip to main content

The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effectiveness of police custody assessments in identifying suspects with intellectual disabilities and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Published in
BMC Medicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-11-248
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan Young, Emily J Goodwin, Ottilie Sedgwick, Gisli H Gudjonsson

Abstract

Intellectual Disabilities (ID) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are recognized psychological vulnerabilities in police interviews and court proceedings in England and Wales. The aims of this study were to investigate: (a) the prevalence of ID and/or ADHD among suspects detained at a large London metropolitan police station and their relationship with conduct disorder (CD), (b) the impact of their condition on police staff resources, (c) the effectiveness of current custody assessment tools in identifying psychological vulnerabilities, and (d) the use of 'Appropriate Adults' in interviews.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 129 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 19%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 9%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 29 22%
Unknown 29 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 44 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 16%
Social Sciences 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 7%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,883,271
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,334
of 4,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,321
of 315,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#28
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.