↓ Skip to main content

Article

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Published in
Malaria Journal, January 2005
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-4-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lina González, Jesus Ochoa, Liliana Franco, Marta Arroyave, Eliana Restrepo, Silvia Blair, Amanda Maestre

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 5%
Unknown 20 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 24%
Student > Postgraduate 4 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Unknown 2 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2017.
All research outputs
#11,140,312
of 12,524,399 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#3,376
of 3,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,834
of 258,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,524,399 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them