↓ Skip to main content

Defining synthetic surfaces for human pluripotent stem cell culture

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Regeneration, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#7 of 189)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Defining synthetic surfaces for human pluripotent stem cell culture
Published in
Cell Regeneration, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-9769-2-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jack W Lambshead, Laurence Meagher, Carmel O'Brien, Andrew L Laslett

Abstract

Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) are able to self-renew indefinitely and to differentiate into all adult cell types. hPSCs therefore show potential for application to drug screening, disease modelling and cellular therapies. In order to meet this potential, culture conditions must be developed that are consistent, defined, scalable, free of animal products and that facilitate stable self-renewal of hPSCs. Several culture surfaces have recently been reported to meet many of these criteria although none of them have been widely implemented by the stem cell community due to issues with validation, reliability and expense. Most hPSC culture surfaces have been derived from extracellular matrix proteins (ECMPs) and their cell adhesion molecule (CAM) binding motifs. Elucidating the CAM-mediated cell-surface interactions that are essential for the in vitro maintenance of pluripotency will facilitate the optimisation of hPSC culture surfaces. Reports indicate that hPSC cultures can be supported by cell-surface interactions through certain CAM subtypes but not by others. This review summarises the recent reports of defined surfaces for hPSC culture and focuses on the CAMs and ECMPs involved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 3%
United States 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 92 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 23%
Student > Master 16 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 12 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 21%
Engineering 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Chemistry 6 6%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#2,589,098
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Cell Regeneration
#7
of 189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,224
of 315,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Regeneration
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 189 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them