↓ Skip to main content

Parallel RNA Interference Screens Identify EGFR Activation as an Escape Mechanism in FGFR3-Mutant Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Discovery, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Parallel RNA Interference Screens Identify EGFR Activation as an Escape Mechanism in FGFR3-Mutant Cancer
Published in
Cancer Discovery, September 2013
DOI 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-12-0569
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Teresa Herrera-Abreu, Alex Pearson, James Campbell, Steve D. Shnyder, Margaret A. Knowles, Alan Ashworth, Nicholas C. Turner

Abstract

Activation of fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) is a common oncogenic event. Little is known about the determinants of sensitivity to FGFR inhibition and how these may vary between different oncogenic FGFRs. Using parallel RNA interference (RNAi) genetic screens, we show that the EGF receptor (EGFR) limits sensitivity to FGFR inhibition in FGFR3-mutant and -translocated cell lines, but not in other FGFR-driven cell lines. We also identify two distinct mechanisms through which EGFR limits sensitivity. In partially FGFR3-dependent lines, inhibition of FGFR3 results in transient downregulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling that is rescued by rapid upregulation of EGFR signaling. In cell lines that are intrinsically resistant to FGFR inhibition, EGFR dominates signaling via repression of FGFR3, with EGFR inhibition rescued by delayed upregulation of FGFR3 expression. Importantly, combinations of FGFR and EGFR inhibitors overcome these resistance mechanisms in vitro and in vivo. Our results illustrate the power of parallel RNAi screens in identifying common resistance mechanisms to targeted therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 1%
Unknown 92 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 17%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 23%
Computer Science 1 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 14 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,956,980
of 23,347,114 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Discovery
#1,050
of 3,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,599
of 199,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Discovery
#10
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,347,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,741 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.