↓ Skip to main content

Visual cue training to improve walking and turning after stroke: a study protocol for a multi-centre, single blind randomised pilot trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Visual cue training to improve walking and turning after stroke: a study protocol for a multi-centre, single blind randomised pilot trial
Published in
Trials, September 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-276
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kristen L Hollands, Trudy Pelton, Andrew Wimperis, Diane Whitham, Sue Jowett, Catherine Sackley, Wing Alan, Paulette van Vliet

Abstract

Visual information comprises one of the most salient sources of information used to control walking and the dependence on vision to maintain dynamic stability increases following a stroke. We hypothesize, therefore, that rehabilitation efforts incorporating visual cues may be effective in triggering recovery and adaptability of gait following stroke. This feasibility trial aims to estimate probable recruitment rate, effect size, treatment adherence and response to gait training with visual cues in contrast to conventional overground walking practice following stroke.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 264 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 17%
Student > Bachelor 45 17%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 71 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 48 18%
Neuroscience 22 8%
Psychology 14 5%
Sports and Recreations 12 5%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 82 31%