↓ Skip to main content

Evidence of the shifting baseline syndrome in ethnobotanical research

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#37 of 610)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence of the shifting baseline syndrome in ethnobotanical research
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-75
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia Hanazaki, Dannieli Firme Herbst, Mel Simionato Marques, Ina Vandebroek

Abstract

The shifting baseline syndrome is a concept from ecology that can be analyzed in the context of ethnobotanical research. Evidence of shifting baseline syndrome can be found in studies dealing with intracultural variation of knowledge, when knowledge from different generations is compared and combined with information about changes in the environment and/or natural resources.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 5 4%
Sweden 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 106 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 22%
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 10 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 47%
Environmental Science 30 26%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 11 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,318,879
of 14,414,019 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#37
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,669
of 254,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,414,019 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.