↓ Skip to main content

Free for Service: The Inadequate Incentives for Quality Peer Review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Free for Service: The Inadequate Incentives for Quality Peer Review
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-3216-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph Bernstein

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 10%
Unknown 9 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 20%
Other 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Social Sciences 3 30%
Unspecified 2 20%
Computer Science 2 20%
Psychology 1 10%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,368,409
of 12,802,184 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#325
of 5,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,609
of 243,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#8
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,802,184 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,321 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.