↓ Skip to main content

Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prenatal screening for major congenital heart disease: assessing performance by combining national cardiac audit with maternity data
Published in
Heart, November 2013
DOI 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-304640
Pubmed ID
Authors

Helena M Gardiner, Alexander Kovacevic, Laila B van der Heijden, Patricia W Pfeiffer, Rodney CG Franklin, John L Gibbs, Ian E Averiss, Joan M LaRovere

Abstract

Determine maternity hospital and lesion-specific prenatal detection rates of major congenital heart disease (mCHD) for hospitals referring prenatally and postnatally to one Congenital Cardiac Centre, and assess interhospital relative performance (relative risk, RR).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 67 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 16%
Student > Postgraduate 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 9 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 62%
Psychology 4 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2014.
All research outputs
#12,138,629
of 15,922,193 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#3,944
of 4,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,557
of 264,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#37
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,922,193 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.