You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Difficulties in implementation of the project 'HUPE against sepsis': speaking of people who watch
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc12919 |
| Authors |
Sérgio da Cunha, Mário Castro Álvares Perez, Elisabete Novello Ferreira, Luana Ferreira de Almeida, Eliane Passos Pereira Assumpção, Paulo Vieira Damasco, Jorge da Silva Motta, Rogério Marques de Souza, Viviane Silva eSilva, Elizabeth de Andrade Marques, Vagner Ismerim Lobão, Irene de Souza eSilva, Ana Alice de A Triani, Jessica Bernardes Almeida Borges da Silva, Julio Cesar Delgado Correal, Catherine Valdez, Jessica Oliveira |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,987
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,233
of 228,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#61
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.