↓ Skip to main content

Clinical outcomes of locked plating of distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical outcomes of locked plating of distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-799x-8-43
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin F Hoffmann, Clifford B Jones, Debra L Sietsema, Paul Tornetta, Scott J Koenig

Abstract

Locked plating (LP) of distal femoral fractures has become very popular. Despite technique suggestions from anecdotal and some early reports, knowledge about risk factors for failure, nonunion (NU), and revision is limited. The purpose of this study was to analyze the complications and clinical outcomes of LP treatment for distal femoral fractures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 126 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 14%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Postgraduate 16 13%
Other 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 31 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 57%
Engineering 11 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 33 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,286,644
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#644
of 1,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,365
of 306,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,364 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.