↓ Skip to main content

Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
269 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Non-pharmacological interventions for breathlessness in advanced stages of malignant and non-malignant diseases
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005623.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Bausewein, Sara Booth, Marjolein Gysels, Irene J Higginson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 248 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 47 17%
Student > Master 45 17%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 11%
Student > Postgraduate 28 10%
Other 87 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 140 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 13%
Unspecified 27 10%
Psychology 23 9%
Sports and Recreations 10 4%
Other 33 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,554,547
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,735
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,649
of 239,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#89
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.