↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge, use and management of native wild edible plants from a seasonal dry forest (NE, Brazil)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge, use and management of native wild edible plants from a seasonal dry forest (NE, Brazil)
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-9-79
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margarita Paloma Cruz, Nivaldo Peroni, Ulysses Paulino Albuquerque

Abstract

Despite being an ancient practice that satisfies basic human needs, the use of wild edible plants tends to be forgotten along with associated knowledge in rural communities. The objective of this work is to analyze existing relationships between knowledge, use, and management of native wild edible plants and socioeconomic factors such as age, gender, family income, individual income, past occupation and current occupation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 131 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 16 12%
Researcher 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Other 32 24%
Unknown 21 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 40%
Environmental Science 22 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 32 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2013.
All research outputs
#14,767,396
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#488
of 731 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,555
of 306,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#10
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 731 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.