↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional interventions for reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in adults undergoing radical pelvic radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
191 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nutritional interventions for reducing gastrointestinal toxicity in adults undergoing radical pelvic radiotherapy
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, November 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009896.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline C Henson, Sorrel Burden, Susan E Davidson, Simon Lal

Abstract

Across the developed world, an estimated 150,000 to 300,000 people are treated annually with pelvic radiotherapy and 80% will develop gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms during treatment. Acute GI symptoms are associated with a greater risk of chronic, often debilitating, GI symptoms. Up to one-third of patients are malnourished before pelvic radiotherapy and up to four-fifths of patients lose weight during treatment. Malnutrition is linked to a higher risk of GI toxicity, which can lead to breaks in radiotherapy and early cessation of chemotherapy, thus compromising the efficacy of the primary cancer treatment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 187 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 16%
Researcher 26 14%
Student > Bachelor 22 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 34 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 10%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Psychology 7 4%
Other 31 16%
Unknown 43 23%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,232,065
of 15,295,156 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,849
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,259
of 260,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,295,156 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.