↓ Skip to main content

Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Domiciliary oxygen for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd001744.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Josephine M Cranston, Alan Crockett, John Moss, John H Alpers

Abstract

Domiciliary oxygen therapy has become one of the major forms of treatment for hypoxaemic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 136 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Student > Master 22 15%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 14 10%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 30 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2020.
All research outputs
#966,194
of 16,411,991 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,613
of 11,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,381
of 266,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#25
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,411,991 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.