↓ Skip to main content

Platelet-rich plasma: why intra-articular? A systematic review of preclinical studies and clinical evidence on PRP for joint degeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Platelet-rich plasma: why intra-articular? A systematic review of preclinical studies and clinical evidence on PRP for joint degeneration
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00167-013-2743-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. Filardo, E. Kon, A. Roffi, B. Di Matteo, M. L. Merli, M. Marcacci

Abstract

The aim of this review was to analyze the available evidence on the clinical application of this biological approach for the injective treatment of cartilage lesions and joint degeneration, together with preclinical studies to support the rationale for the use of platelet concentrates, to shed some light and give indications on what to treat and what to expect from intra-articular injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 175 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Master 25 14%
Student > Postgraduate 23 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Unspecified 15 8%
Other 64 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 53%
Unspecified 28 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 4%
Other 21 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#6,290,044
of 12,215,443 outputs
Outputs from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#674
of 1,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,673
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
#21
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,215,443 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,501 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.