↓ Skip to main content

Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Auliya A Suwantika, Maarten J Postma

Abstract

Rotavirus infection has been reported to be responsible for the majority of severe diarrhea in children under-5-years-old in Indonesia. Breast milk is considered to give protection against rotavirus infection. Increasing breastfeeding promotion programs could be an alternative target to reduce the incidence of rotavirus diarrhea. This study aims to investigate the effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia, focusing on breastfeeding education and support interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 2 2%
Kenya 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 108 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 18%
Researcher 19 17%
Student > Bachelor 14 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 26 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 15%
Social Sciences 10 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 5%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,864,199
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,906
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,779
of 306,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#160
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.