You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1106 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Auliya A Suwantika, Maarten J Postma |
Abstract |
Rotavirus infection has been reported to be responsible for the majority of severe diarrhea in children under-5-years-old in Indonesia. Breast milk is considered to give protection against rotavirus infection. Increasing breastfeeding promotion programs could be an alternative target to reduce the incidence of rotavirus diarrhea. This study aims to investigate the effect of breastfeeding promotion interventions on cost-effectiveness of rotavirus immunization in Indonesia, focusing on breastfeeding education and support interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 2 | 2% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Peru | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
Researcher | 19 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 25% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2014.
All research outputs
#12,864,199
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#8,906
of 14,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,779
of 306,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#160
of 263 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 263 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.