↓ Skip to main content

Friendship networks and physical activity and sedentary behavior among youth: a systematized review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
104 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
262 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Friendship networks and physical activity and sedentary behavior among youth: a systematized review
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keri Jo Sawka, Gavin R McCormack, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Penelope Hawe, Patricia K Doyle-Baker

Abstract

Low levels of physical activity and increased participation in sedentary leisure-time activities are two important obesity-risk behaviors that impact the health of today's youth. Friend's health behaviors have been shown to influence individual health behaviors; however, current evidence on the specific role of friendship networks in relation to levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior is limited. The purpose of this review was to summarize evidence on friendship networks and both physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 262 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 256 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 17%
Researcher 21 8%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 5%
Other 48 18%
Unknown 70 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 35 13%
Social Sciences 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 11%
Sports and Recreations 25 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 9%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 87 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,117,775
of 25,381,864 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#367
of 2,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,948
of 320,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,381,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.