You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What could a strengthened right to health bring to the post-2015 health development agenda?: interrogating the role of the minimum core concept in advancing essential global health needs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-13-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lisa Forman, Gorik Ooms, Audrey Chapman, Eric Friedman, Attiya Waris, Everaldo Lamprea, Moses Mulumba |
| Abstract |
Global health institutions increasingly recognize that the right to health should guide the formulation of replacement goals for the Millennium Development Goals, which expire in 2015. However, the right to health's contribution is undercut by the principle of progressive realization, which links provision of health services to available resources, permitting states to deny even basic levels of health coverage domestically and allowing international assistance for health to remain entirely discretionary. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Colombia | 3 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Belgium | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Researcher | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 22% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 21 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 30 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2017.
All research outputs
#3,703,630
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,544
of 17,508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,313
of 320,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#73
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,508 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.