You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Purva Abhyankar, Robert J Volk, Jennifer Blumenthal-Barby, Paulina Bravo, Angela Buchholz, Elissa Ozanne, Dale Colins Vidal, Nananda Col, Peep Stalmeier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
| Spain | 1 | 9% |
| India | 1 | 9% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 9% |
| Austria | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 18% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 144 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 140 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 26% |
| Unknown | 20 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 9% |
| Psychology | 12 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2020.
All research outputs
#4,079,964
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#342
of 2,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,660
of 311,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#12
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,025 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.