↓ Skip to main content

Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictable progressive Doppler deterioration in IUGR: does it really exist?
Published in
American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, December 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.08.039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julia Unterscheider, Sean Daly, Michael Patrick Geary, Mairead Mary Kennelly, Fionnuala Mary McAuliffe, Keelin O'Donoghue, Alyson Hunter, John Joseph Morrison, Gerard Burke, Patrick Dicker, Elizabeth Catherine Tully, Fergal Desmond Malone

Abstract

An objective of the Prospective Observational Trial to Optimize Pediatric Health in IUGR (PORTO) study was to evaluate multivessel Doppler changes in a large cohort of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) fetuses to establish whether a predictable progressive sequence of Doppler deterioration exists and to correlate these Doppler findings with respective perinatal outcomes.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 114 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Postgraduate 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 37 32%
Unknown 6 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 77%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Social Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 12 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,246,006
of 12,070,876 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#6,407
of 8,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,645
of 202,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology
#72
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,070,876 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.