↓ Skip to main content

Brain white matter microstructure alterations in adolescent rhesus monkeys exposed to early life stress: associations with high cortisol during infancy

Overview of attention for article published in Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brain white matter microstructure alterations in adolescent rhesus monkeys exposed to early life stress: associations with high cortisol during infancy
Published in
Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/2045-5380-3-21
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brittany R Howell, Kai M McCormack, Alison P Grand, Nikki T Sawyer, Xiaodong Zhang, Dario Maestripieri, Xiaoping Hu, Mar M Sanchez

Abstract

Early adverse experiences, especially those involving disruption of the mother-infant relationship, are detrimental for proper socioemotional development in primates. Humans with histories of childhood maltreatment are at high risk for developing psychopathologies including depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and behavioral disorders. However, the underlying neurodevelopmental alterations are not well understood. Here we used a nonhuman primate animal model of infant maltreatment to study the long-term effects of this early life stress on brain white matter integrity during adolescence, its behavioral correlates, and the relationship with early levels of stress hormones.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 132 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 23%
Researcher 28 20%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 17 12%
Unknown 27 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 32 23%
Psychology 30 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,089,219
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#5
of 66 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,969
of 307,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Mood & Anxiety Disorders
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 66 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them