↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in early primary Sjögren's syndrome: a prospective, multi-center, follow-up study

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of rituximab treatment in early primary Sjögren's syndrome: a prospective, multi-center, follow-up study
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/ar4359
Pubmed ID
Authors

Francesco Carubbi, Paola Cipriani, Alessandra Marrelli, Paola Di Benedetto, Piero Ruscitti, Onorina Berardicurti, Ilenia Pantano, Vasiliki Liakouli, Saverio Alvaro, Alessia Alunno, Antonio Manzo, Francesco Ciccia, Roberto Gerli, Giovanni Triolo, Roberto Giacomelli

Abstract

Primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) is an autoimmune disorder affecting exocrine glands; however, a subgroup of pSS patients experience systemic extra-glandular involvement leading to a worsening of disease prognosis. Current therapeutic options are mainly empiric and often translated by other autoimmune diseases. In the last few years growing evidence suggests that B-cell depletion by rituximab (RTX) is effective also in pSS. Patients with early active disease appear to be those who could benefit the most from RTX. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of RTX in comparison to disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in early active pSS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 14 11%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 13 10%
Other 25 20%
Unknown 21 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 61 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 2%
Psychology 3 2%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 31 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,535,680
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#988
of 3,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,758
of 225,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#15
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,380 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.