↓ Skip to main content

Safety of EEG–fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Neurophysiology, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Safety of EEG–fMRI recordings in newborn infants at 3T: A study using a baby-size phantom
Published in
Clinical Neurophysiology, May 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.09.041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sampsa Vanhatalo, Aiman Alnajjar, Vinh T. Nguyen, Paul Colditz, Peter Fransson

Abstract

We aimed to study EEG electrode temperatures during MRI recordings using a neonatal-size phantom to establish the safety of neonatal EEG-MRI.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Finland 1 2%
Hungary 1 2%
Austria 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 39 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 23%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Other 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Engineering 10 23%
Psychology 8 18%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 8 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#7,537,260
of 12,060,822 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Neurophysiology
#919
of 1,871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,243
of 198,061 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Neurophysiology
#13
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,060,822 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,871 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,061 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.