↓ Skip to main content

Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psychiatric patients’ views on why their involuntary hospitalisation was right or wrong: a qualitative study
Published in
Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology, August 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00127-011-0427-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Katsakou, Diana Rose, Tim Amos, Len Bowers, Rosemarie McCabe, Danielle Oliver, Til Wykes, Stefan Priebe

Abstract

To explore involuntary patients' retrospective views on why their hospitalisation was right or wrong.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 2 2%
Denmark 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 84 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 19%
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 9 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 27%
Psychology 24 27%
Social Sciences 16 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 9%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 11 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2016.
All research outputs
#2,350,187
of 15,396,803 outputs
Outputs from Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology
#472
of 1,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,194
of 262,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Psychiatry & Psychiatric Epidemiology
#8
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,396,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,156 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.