↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of Diabetes Risk Score Estimates and Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles in a Middle-Aged Irish Population

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of Diabetes Risk Score Estimates and Cardiometabolic Risk Profiles in a Middle-Aged Irish Population
Published in
PLOS ONE, November 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0078950
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catherine M. Phillips, Patricia M. Kearney, Vera J. McCarthy, Janas M. Harrington, Anthony P. Fitzgerald, Ivan J. Perry

Abstract

To compare diabetes risk assessment tools in estimating risk of developing type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and to evaluate cardiometabolic risk profiles in a middle-aged Irish population.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 19%
Student > Master 6 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Professor 3 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Materials Science 2 6%
Engineering 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,173,175
of 16,743,393 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,323
of 161,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,862
of 267,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,238
of 7,363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,743,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161,709 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7,363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.