↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008832.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maurits W Gosler, Mark Testroote, JW Morrenhof, Heinrich MJ Janzing

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Master 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Other 6 9%
Other 19 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 59%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 12%
Unspecified 8 12%
Social Sciences 5 7%
Psychology 3 4%
Other 4 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#7,230,389
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,314
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,266
of 258,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#144
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.