↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating humeral shaft fractures in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008832.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gosler, Maurits W, Testroote, Mark, Morrenhof, JW, Janzing, Heinrich MJ

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 61 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Master 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 58%
Unspecified 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#6,954,985
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,402
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,614
of 266,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.