↓ Skip to main content

A mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
72 news outlets
blogs
27 blogs
twitter
317 tweeters
facebook
41 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
316 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
801 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
A mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos
Published in
Nature, December 2013
DOI 10.1038/nature12788
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthias Meyer, Qiaomei Fu, Ayinuer Aximu-Petri, Isabelle Glocke, Birgit Nickel, Juan-Luis Arsuaga, Ignacio Martínez, Ana Gracia, José María Bermúdez de Castro, Eudald Carbonell, Svante Pääbo

Abstract

Excavations of a complex of caves in the Sierra de Atapuerca in northern Spain have unearthed hominin fossils that range in age from the early Pleistocene to the Holocene. One of these sites, the 'Sima de los Huesos' ('pit of bones'), has yielded the world's largest assemblage of Middle Pleistocene hominin fossils, consisting of at least 28 individuals dated to over 300,000 years ago. The skeletal remains share a number of morphological features with fossils classified as Homo heidelbergensis and also display distinct Neanderthal-derived traits. Here we determine an almost complete mitochondrial genome sequence of a hominin from Sima de los Huesos and show that it is closely related to the lineage leading to mitochondrial genomes of Denisovans, an eastern Eurasian sister group to Neanderthals. Our results pave the way for DNA research on hominins from the Middle Pleistocene.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 317 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 2%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Germany 7 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
France 4 <1%
Brazil 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 733 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 203 25%
Researcher 152 19%
Student > Bachelor 114 14%
Student > Master 95 12%
Professor 48 6%
Other 143 18%
Unknown 46 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 325 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 117 15%
Social Sciences 80 10%
Arts and Humanities 71 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 5%
Other 88 11%
Unknown 82 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1039. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,493
of 17,606,952 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#974
of 80,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62
of 273,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#15
of 917 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,606,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 80,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 89.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 917 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.