↓ Skip to main content

Establishing accurate baseline estimates of breeding populations of a burrowing seabird, the grey-faced petrel (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) in New Zealand

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
Establishing accurate baseline estimates of breeding populations of a burrowing seabird, the grey-faced petrel (Pterodroma macroptera gouldi) in New Zealand
Published in
Biological Conservation, January 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.002
Authors

Amy L. Whitehead, Philip O’B. Lyver, Christopher J. Jones, Peter J. Bellingham, Catriona J. MacLeod, Morgan Coleman, Brian J. Karl, Keven Drew, David Pairman, Andrew M. Gormley, Richard P. Duncan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Philippines 1 2%
Unknown 59 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 21%
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 52%
Environmental Science 18 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 5 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,930,802
of 12,056,958 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,815
of 3,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,200
of 199,957 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#51
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,056,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,957 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.