↓ Skip to main content

Brazilian Science and Research Integrity: Where are We? What Next?

Overview of attention for article published in Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 233)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Brazilian Science and Research Integrity: Where are We? What Next?
Published in
Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, June 2015
DOI 10.1590/0001-3765201520150165
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sonia M.R. Vasconcelos, Martha M. Sorenson, Edson H. Watanabe, Debora Foguel, Marisa Palácios

Abstract

Building a world-class scientific community requires first-class ingredients at many different levels: funding, training, management, international collaborations, creativity, ethics, and an understanding of research integrity practices. All over the world, addressing these practices has been high on the science policy agenda of major research systems. Universities have a central role in fostering a culture of research integrity, which has posed additional challenges for faculty, students and administrators - but also opportunities. In Brazil, the leading universities and governmental funding agencies are collaborating on this project, but much remains to be done.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 17%
Professor 5 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Computer Science 3 7%
Other 17 41%
Unknown 4 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,469,365
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#42
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,323
of 272,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.