You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patterns of nitrogen accumulation and cycling in riparian floodplain ecosystems along the Green and Yampa rivers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oecologia, January 2004
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00442-004-1486-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Carol Adair, Dan Binkley, Douglas C. Andersen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Austria | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 10% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 30 | 31% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 17 | 17% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2006.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#1,681
of 4,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,105
of 54,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#8
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 54,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.